choosing and putting in an e mail server?
i have to get an e-mail server (both on home windows or linux) relying on value. does anybody know the price of home windows mail server.
how about linux? what's its reliability if its free?
and what are the machie necessities for putting in home windows meial server?
different particulars which i'll have disregarded, if answered, may also be enormously appreciated.
Martin King solutions:
In order to run a legitimate mail server you first want a website with an applicable MX records, however I am assuming that you have already got all that.
There are a number of decisions for home windows. If your server is already operating Widnows XP or 2003 Server then I would advocate that you simply install one of many following:
M) Microsoft Exchage (often very costly, however has a load of options like calendar, process synchronization and imap)
P) Pegasus/Mercury mail server (which is free and in addition very nicely-featured)
I would see no specific cause to run the mail server on linux, because it introduces many new issues for an inexperienced consumer. You must be effective with a Windows machine and a superb firewall (zonealarm or bitdefender) or, ideally, an exterior firewall/router.
If you continue to want to attempt linux, the best method is to make some free area in your home windows partition after which fetch a copy of Ubuntu linux - server version. The graphical installer ought to information you thru all of the steps you should get your server working. Choose the XMail server for linux, because it has a really good distant configuration and account administration software, which may be run from a home windows machine.
Here are the hyperlinks:
http://www.pmail.com/downloads.htm <- pegasus mail
http://www.zonealarm.com/retailer/content material/catalog/merchandise/sku_list_za.jsp?dc=12bms&ctry=US&lang=en <- zone alarm firewall
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/obtain <- ubuntu
Once you could have the mail server up and operating you may also want to attempt some kind of antivirus/spam safety:
What options do you might have for making a Linux-based mostly house server?
I'm trying to construct a Linux-based mostly server to be used at residence. I'm not new with Linux, however I'm not an skilled by any stretch of the creativeness. I'm wanting, particularly, for distribution, software program, safety, and configuration ideas. I'd just like the server to have the ability to do quite a few issues:
*Private SMB/CIFS server for native community
*Media server, for iTunes and Xbox 360
*FTP/Webserver, password-protected, accessible from web.
*Media middle options (Maybe?)
*Possibility for future enlargement.
Part of me needs to make use of Ubuntu or Fedora, for familiarity's sake, however maybe there's a higher choice.
Martin King solutions:
Follow the "how tos":
is the one I adopted for my web server. It has every part you want. I use ISPConfig for server administration:
And that is all I want....and I had by no means achieved a Linux server earlier than...
Which Linux taste is best as a File Server ?
I need to create a File Server utilizing Linux which i need to hook up with Windows XP workstations.
Which taste is the easist to handle for easy consumer administration and file sharing?
Do I want one other software program apps for xp and linux to speak. I simply utilizing excel information for file sharing throughout community. I had Pentium A P Ghz with 256 MB
Martin King solutions:
If you want a free help Linux, I advocate CEntOS A.A however in case you are prepared to expend on help value I advocate Red Hat Enterprise Linux A.x. No want for a one other software program to speak Linux with Windows, as there's already a SAMBA module in linux, which is already a package deal in all Linux distro. SAMBA module is a medium between Linux and Windows (see /etc/smb.conf file the samba configuration file). If you're actually need to use or to know Linux you gotta be affected person sufficient to know it. Coz in contrast to Windows that are all spoon fed, whereas Linux shouldn't be, you want some considering man.
"Linux is geeks selection"
File and Print Server ! ! !?
Hi Knowledgble People,
We have gotten a SBS 2003 and virtually 25 customers in our small firm.
Is that OK ? Will SBS be capable of deal with each factor ?
its acquired good mem and area.
We are considering , of getting one other server, in order that the load from this server is decreased.
What would you guys advocate, Is SBS a great choice will it survive 30 customers ( MAX we'll ever attain )
Should i make an XP field a File and PRint server ( could be a dangerous concept , however simply my P cents 😉 ) as this may be simply maintained.
Or else ought to i take a look at Linux or some factor in these strains
or Upgrade to a full server 2003 .
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ARE WELCOME.
Martin King solutions:
In THEORY, you need to have all providers on their very own servers. BUT, in actuality, it is impractical and from a useful resource utilization standpoint, pointless for many small companies.
It would assist to know your specs... But merely put, A GB of RAM and ANY CPU at the moment will do SBS high quality. What USUALLY makes extra of a distinction is the configuration of your disk subsystem. IDEALLY, you'll have H to S onerous drives configured in a RAID M for the OS and a few logs and different data and a RAID H or 10 for issues like file serving and the Exchange database. A non RAID disk may also be used to enhance general efficiency of the Volume Shadow Copy service (which I STRONGLY encourage you employ).
As for licensing, sure the SBS CALs are costlier, however every features a copy of Outlook and Exchange CAL, so all issues thought-about, they're CHEAPER - AND simpler to handle. Standard server and Exchange aren't optimized to stay on the identical server as SBS is, they usually lack the wizards that make managing the server simpler.
As talked about XP is restricted to 10 concurrent connections so making it a file server is a nasty concept. (Even in networks of10 or fewer, domains present administration talents and SBS servers, options, that XP techniques can't supply).
SBS is a VERY dependable platform and performs nicely within the overwhelming majority of the installations. PROVIDED you set it up appropriately. The individuals who have answered earlier than me CLEARLY aren't SBS professionals - they could know Server nicely, however SBS is totally different (I discovered the arduous approach). I would actually advocate you rent a advisor EXPERIENCED in SBS (not simply Windows Server) and have them set you up appropriately. You can handle issues your self, however a correct setup vs. A pieced collectively setup of "considering" you realize what to do might imply the distinction between HUGE consulting payments later and a system the place your advisor checks in as soon as a month for an hour and also you deal with the remaining.
You can get extra info from my web web page on SBS - www.lwcomputing.com/ideas/static/sbs.asp
Compare Linux distro options
I'm making an attempt to get a transparent concept of which distros originated which options. There are an terrible lot of superior improvements widespread to many distros, however all of them should have began someplace.
Which ones' origins are you conscious of?
Also, if anybody is aware of a website with this type of info, that'd be helpful.
Anything that is not a part of the GNU software program suite, I need to know the origins of. I'm not bothered, on this occasion, about which distro presently has what as it could possibly all be ported. I simply need to know who developed it first, please.
Thank you in your appreciable contribution, it has been most informative.
I sit up for listening to from others, particularly with experience in different distros. Please, although, in future no placing-down of any distros.
Martin King solutions:
Hi, u already know lately all distros have just about the identical options, however any particular u need to know of? I might help if u can please state which of them u r speaking about.
Well most linux distros which invent one thing I have all the time observed make it GPL
Alright so Redhat developed the rpm package deal format and the yum package deal administration system fedora makes use of.
They additionally developed SELinux which controls the consumer permissions or degree of entry purposes need to sure providers so even an unknown exploit is innocent.
Debian developed the .deb package deal format and apt package deal administration system.
Redhat had made few different applied sciences as nicely comparable to virtualization for the enterprise merchandise however redhat primarily focuses on the server market.
Redhat additionally developed "aiglx" after Novell created XGL/Compiz, XGL shaped a man-made layer over your vga card in easy phrases that allowed compositing with out succesful 3d accelerated drivers.
Since compiz required XGL at first then aiglx was created to offer u some advantages of XGL however permit u 3d acceleration with out utilizing XGL, this was a profit to compiz customers with ATI playing cards trigger ATI drivers sucked. Later Novell's compiz communities broke as much as type compiz and beryl after which joined once more to for compis fusion, u in all probability already know that.
Novell developed Compiz Fusion and XGL, they helped create Qemu and Xen virtualization applied sciences, additionally they fund and develop hypervisor they usually have many different apps like Novell Netware etc.
They developed Apparmor which is barely simpler and higher to handle then SELinux, that is the rationale even ubuntu makes use of it. Novell created the evolution mail shopper and the kde kick off menu.
They funded and developed mono which is now utilized in gnome and all different distros.
SUSE has had drive encryption since model S or H, unsure whereas fedora and ubuntu obtained it now.
Novell created Yast configuration software. Yast I assume stands for Your superior system device or one thing like that.
The first indexing service for looking information in linux was launched by Novell, its referred to as Beagle.
Novell r creating moonlight which is the open supply silver mild from Microsoft.
Novell contributes code to openoffice as nicely and employs extra free software program builders than eanyone else. Novell's enterprise openoffice model was the primary openoffice model to have best help for microsoft workplace information a part of the microsoft deal.
Novell makes use of the rpm package deal format however as an alternative of yum they've created zypper and their very own SAT solver which is as quick as debian and solves dependencies in the identical method if not higher.
Again suse devs created the software program droop energy administration system and Novell maintains it, its one of the crucial dependable energy saving in linux and has been ported to few different distros as nicely. Fedora's is not dangerous both and neither is Mandriva's.
Novell created the gnome slab menu and the gnome management middle.
Then Mandriva was one of many first to create a simple to make use of linux distro with their very own management middle and stuff.
I will add extra information quickly, as u can see I know principally about SUSE's innovation trigger u might not know this however I am an enormous fan of openSUSE.
Oh yeah, now lets record ubuntu's corridor of innovation.
Uhhhhhhh.......there have to be one thing, oh yeah the human theme, horrible energy administration, updates breaking stuff and buggy software program. And do not forget their superior launchpad, as soon as u report a bug u watch for the subsequent P releases to return out earlier than the bug is fastened...candy, how cool is that?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers